Massive vs. Webshare: Which Proxy Provider Delivers Better Value in 2025?

When choosing between proxy providers, the decision often comes down to balancing performance, pricing, and ethical sourcing practices. Two compelling options in today's market are Massive and Webshare. Each brings distinct advantages to different use cases, from high-performance web scraping to cost-effective data collection at scale.

Massive is a US-based company that entered the proxy market in 2024 with a focus on premium performance, verifiable ethical sourcing, and transparent pricing. Its AppEsteem-certified network and exceptional speed make it ideal for enterprises requiring reliable, ethically-sourced data for AI/ML applications and performance-critical scraping.

Webshare, established in 2018, is known for delivering affordable proxy solutions with competitive performance metrics. Based in the United States, the company focuses on providing accessible pricing while maintaining solid reliability across residential and datacenter proxy types, making it attractive for teams with budget constraints.

‍

Performance & Features Breakdown: Massive vs. Webshare

<table class="GeneratedTable">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Attribute</th>
<th>Massive</th>
<th>Webshare</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Ethical sourcing & accreditation</td>
<td>AppEsteem-certified SDK, 100% opt-in</td>
<td>Claims ethical sourcing, limited transparency</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Proxy acquisition model</td>
<td>In-app opt-in SDK</td>
<td>Undisclosed sourcing methods</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Residential IP pool size</td>
<td>1M+ advertised</td>
<td>80M+ advertised</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Residential success rate</td>
<td>99.87% (US) / 99.66% (Global)</td>
<td>98.27% (US) / 99.58% (Global)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Residential success rate on Amazon / Google / Instagram</td>
<td>93.85% / 88.29% / 96.29%</td>
<td>95.63% / 88.35% / 92.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Residential response time</td>
<td>0.52 s (US & EU) / 0.92 s (Global)</td>
<td>1.36 s (US) / 1.49 s (Global)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Residential response time on Amazon / Google / Instagram</td>
<td>3.68 s / 4.56 s / 3.97 s</td>
<td>4.83 s / 5.38 s / 6.12 s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ISP success rate</td>
<td>100%</td>
<td>98.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ISP success rate on Amazon / Google</td>
<td>98.03% / 100%</td>
<td>87.26% / 84.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ISP response time</td>
<td>0.09 s</td>
<td>0.42 s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ISP response time on Amazon / Google</td>
<td>2.85 s / 2.13 s</td>
<td>3.08 s / 3.13 s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sticky-IP window</td>
<td>1 – 60 min</td>
<td>1 – 30 min</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Device filters</td>
<td>Desktop / mobile / TV</td>
<td>—</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>PAYG price per GB</td>
<td>$3.99</td>
<td>$3.50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Billing extras</td>
<td>Traffic rollover</td>
<td>Standard billing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Bandwidth rollover</td>
<td>✅ Yes</td>
<td>❌ No</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>KYC requirements</td>
<td>✅ Optional (restricted targets)</td>
<td>✅ Minimal</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Usage restrictions</td>
<td>Blocks high-risk & adult content</td>
<td>Standard restrictions</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mobile proxy pool</td>
<td>Coming soon</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Other products</td>
<td>SERP API</td>
<td>Datacenter proxies, browser extensions</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

‍

What Are the Pros and Cons of Massive?

✅ Pros

• Ethical & Compliance Certification: AppEsteem-certified network sourced via a proprietary SDK with explicit user consent, ensuring 100% opt-in, third-party-validated proxies.
• Superior Performance: Outperforms Webshare in key metrics including faster response times (0.67s vs 1.36s US), higher ISP success rates (100% vs 84.67% on Google), and better overall latency.
• High Success Rates: 99.87% success on US targets and exceptional ISP proxy performance across major platforms.
• Value-Added Features: Bandwidth rollover ensures unused monthly data carries over, providing significant value for subscription plans.
• Premium IP Quality: Delivers consistently clean IPs with low fraud scores and superior reliability for sensitive use cases.

❌ Cons

• Higher Entry Price: $3.99/GB compared to Webshare's $3.50/GB, making it less accessible for budget-conscious users.
• Limited Proxy Types: Focuses on residential and ISP proxies; lacks the datacenter option currently available from Webshare.
• Newer Market Presence: Launched in 2024, offering less of an established track record compared to Webshare's 6+ years in the market.

‍

What Are the Pros and Cons of Webshare?

✅ Pros

• Competitive Pricing: Lower cost per GB at $3.50 makes it accessible for startups and small teams with limited budgets.
• Diverse Proxy Portfolio: Offers residential, and datacenter proxies, providing flexibility for various use cases.
• Established Provider: Six years of market presence since 2018, building trust through consistent service delivery.
• Minimal Barriers: Simple onboarding process with minimal KYC requirements for faster setup.
• Broad Accessibility: User-friendly platform with browser extensions and straightforward integration options.

❌ Cons

• Lower Performance Metrics: Significantly slower response times (1.36s vs 0.67s US) and reduced ISP success rates compared to Massive.
• No Bandwidth Rollover: Standard "use-it-or-lose-it" billing model can lead to wasted spend for fluctuating usage patterns.
• Opaque Sourcing: Limited transparency around IP acquisition methods and no third-party ethical validation.
• Inconsistent ISP Performance: ISP proxy success rates lag significantly behind Massive, particularly on challenging targets like Google (84.67% vs 100%).

‍

Best For Use Cases

Massive Is Best For Ethical AI/LLM Data Sourcing & Performance-Critical Scraping

Massive is the superior choice for organizations requiring verifiable data provenance for AI/LLM training datasets and high-performance scraping operations. Its transparently sourced, AppEsteem-certified IPs excel in sensitive applications where data integrity and ethical compliance are paramount. The platform's exceptional speed and reliability make it ideal for e-commerce monitoring, travel aggregation, and market research where performance directly impacts business outcomes.

‍

Webshare Is Best For Budget-Conscious Teams & General-Purpose Scraping

Webshare serves teams that prioritize cost-effectiveness over premium performance. Its diverse proxy portfolio and lower pricing make it suitable for general web scraping, SEO monitoring, and social media management where absolute peak performance isn't critical. The platform works well for established workflows that can accommodate longer response times in exchange for budget savings.