Massive vs. NetNut: Proxy Speed, Ethics, and Pricing

TL;DR

Massive is an ideal choice for businesses that require ethical transparency, high-performance proxies, and flexible value-oriented pricing. With a 99.87% US residential success rate, 0.52 s response time, and 100% SDK-based sourcing audited by AppEsteem, it delivers superior performance at competitive rates — starting at $3.99/GB with bandwidth rollover.

NetNut is a suitable alternative for large enterprises that prioritize an extensive IP pool and are willing to pay premium prices for global scale. It offers 85M+ IPs, ISO 27001-certified positioning, and a 98.44% US success rate with 0.84 s response time, though its proprietary sourcing methods are less transparent.

Massive vs. NetNut: Side-by-Side Comparison^*

<table class="GeneratedTable">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Attribute</th>
<th>Massive</th>
<th>NetNut</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Residential IP Pool Size</td>
<td>≈ 1M advertised, 195 countries</td>
<td>85M + advertised, 200 countries</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ethical Sourcing</td>
<td>100% SDK opt-in; AppEsteem-audited</td>
<td>Proprietary reflection + ISP partnerships; no external audit</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pricing & Trial</td>
<td>Pay-as-you-go $3.99/GB, bandwidth rollover, free trial</td>
<td>Starter 28 GB $99 ($3.54/GB), no rollover, free trial</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Compliance Certification</td>
<td>AppEsteem (ethics & safety)</td>
<td>ISO 27001 (infosec)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Location Targeting</td>
<td>Country, state, city, ZIP</td>
<td>Country, state, city</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rotation Controls</td>
<td>Per-request or sticky 1–60 min (user-set)</td>
<td>Per-request or long sticky sessions; no custom timer</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Device Filtering</td>
<td>Desktop / mobile / smart-TV</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Residential success rate</td>
<td>99.87% (US) / 99.66% (Global)</td>
<td>98.44% (US) / 98.4% (Global)</td>
</tr>
<td>Residential success rate on Amazon / Google / Instagram</td>
<td>93.85% / 88.29% / 96.29%</td>
<td>94.30% / 90.96% / 88.76%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Residential response time</td>
<td>0.52 s (US) / 0.92 s (Global)</td>
<td>0.84 s (US) / 1.22 s (Global)</td>
</tr>
<td>Residential response time on Amazon / Google / Instagram</td>
<td>3.68 s / 4.56 s / 3.97 s</td>
<td>4.02 s / 5.01 s / 4.05 s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ISP success rate</td>
<td>100%</td>
<td>100%</td>
</tr>
<td>ISP success rate on Amazon / Google</td>
<td>98.03% / 100%</td>
<td>97.75% / 100%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ISP response time</td>
<td>0.09 s</td>
<td>0.21 s</td>
<tr>
<td>ISP response time on Amazon / Google</td>
<td>2.85 s / 2.13 s</td>
<td>2.95 s / 3.03 s</td>
<tr>
<td>Concurrency / Traffic</td>
<td>Unlimited</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Other Scraper Products</td>
<td>SERP API</td>
<td>SERP API, Website Unblocker, B2B Data Scraper</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

_{*Source: Proxyway 2025 Market Research, company websites}

What Are the Pros and Cons of Massive?

‍

✅ Pros of Massive

• Verifiable #1 performance. Ranked #1 for US-residential success (99.87%), ISP success (100%), and best-case ISP latency (0.09 s).
• Transparent & ethical sourcing. 100% SDK opt-in pool, audited and AppEsteem-certified.
• Flexible, value-oriented pricing. Pay-as-you-go with bandwidth rollover – unused traffic never expires.
• Superior IP quality. Highest-quality IPs yield fewer blocks and lower fraud scores.
• Granular device targeting. Route traffic through desktop, mobile, or smart-TV peers for precise testing.

‍

❌ Cons of Massive

• Smaller advertised pool. ~1 M IPs versus NetNut’s 85 M, which may matter for massive, IP-intensive campaigns.
• Relatively new entrant. Launched in 2024 – shorter enterprise track record than some competitors.

‍

What Are the Pros and Cons of NetNut?

‍

✅ Pros of NetNut

• Extensive IP pool. Advertised 85 M+ residential IPs support extreme-scale campaigns.
• ISO 27001 certified. Meets enterprise-grade information security requirements.
• Diverse proxy types. Offers rotating residential, static residential, mobile, and datacenter proxies.
• Established provider. Operating since 2017 with thousands of customers.
• Built-in unblocker & data-scraper APIs. Website Unblocker and B2B Data Scraper endpoints simplify anti-bot bypass and structured-data retrieval.

‍

❌ Cons of NetNut

• Rigid, high-cost pricing. Prepaid tiers only – no pay-as-you-go or bandwidth rollover, risking unused capacity.
• Opaque sourcing model. Proprietary infrastructure with no third-party audits may pose compliance concerns.

‍

Best For Use Cases

‍

Massive is Best For Ethical AI/LLM Data Sourcing & Performance-Critical Scraping

Massive is best for organizations requiring verifiable data provenance and cost-efficient, high-performance scraping. Its transparently sourced IPs work well for AI/LLM training datasets, while the reliable speeds support competitive web scraping for e-commerce monitoring, travel aggregation, and market research.

‍

NetNut is Best For Maximum Coverage with Enterprise-Grade Security

NetNut is best when maximum IP breadth and formal InfoSec accreditation are essential, making it ideal for high-volume, compliance-driven global campaigns. However, this comes with prepaid requirements and potentially lower success rates.