Massive vs. NetNut: Which Proxy Provider Is Right for Your Business?
Jason Grad
Cofundador
June 19, 2025
Massive is an ideal choice for businesses that require ethical transparency, high-performance proxies, and flexible value-oriented pricing. It delivers superior performance at competitive rates.
NetNut is a suitable alternative for large enterprises that prioritize an extensive IP pool and are willing to pay premium prices for global scale. It offers raw IP scale and ISO-certified enterprise positioning, though its sourcing methods are less transparent.
Massive vs. NetNut at a Glance
<table class="GeneratedTable">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Attribute</th>
<th>Massive</th>
<th>NetNut</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Residential IP Pool Size*</td>
<td>≈ 1 M advertised, 195 countries</td>
<td>85 M + advertised, 200 countries</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ethical Sourcing</td>
<td>100% SDK opt-in; AppEsteem-audited</td>
<td>Proprietary reflection + ISP partnerships; no external audit</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pricing & Trial</td>
<td>Pay-as-you-go $3.99/GB, bandwidth rollover, free trial</td>
<td>Starter 28 GB $99 ($3.54/GB), no rollover, free trial</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Compliance Cert.</td>
<td>AppEsteem (ethics & safety)</td>
<td>ISO 27001 (infosec)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Location Targeting</td>
<td>Country, state, city, ZIP</td>
<td>Country, state, city</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rotation Controls</td>
<td>Per-request or sticky 1–60 min (user-set)</td>
<td>Per-request or long sticky sessions; no custom timer</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Device Filtering</td>
<td>Desktop / mobile / smart-TV</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>US Residential Success Rate</td>
<td>99.87%</td>
<td>98.44%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Global Residential Response Time</td>
<td>0.92 s</td>
<td>1.22 s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ISP Proxy (US) – Success / Response</td>
<td>100% / 0.09 s</td>
<td>100% / 0.21 s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Success Rate – Amazon / Google / Instagram</td>
<td>93.85% / 88.29% / 96.29%</td>
<td>94.30% / 90.96% / 88.76%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Response Time – Amazon / Google / Instagram</td>
<td>3.68 s / 4.56 s / 3.97 s</td>
<td>4.02 s / 5.01 s / 4.05 s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Concurrency / Traffic</td>
<td>Unlimited</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Other Scraper Products</td>
<td>SERP API</td>
<td>SERP API, Website Unblocker, B2B Data Scraper</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
What Are the Pros and Cons of Massive?
✅ Pros of Massive
- Verifiable #1 performance. Ranked #1 for US-residential success (99.87%), ISP success (100%), and best-case ISP latency (0.09 s).
- Transparent & ethical sourcing. 100% SDK opt-in pool, audited and AppEsteem-certified.
- Flexible, value-oriented pricing. Pay-as-you-go with bandwidth rollover – unused traffic never expires.
- Superior IP quality. Highest-quality IPs yield fewer blocks and lower fraud scores.
- Granular device targeting. Route traffic through desktop, mobile, or smart-TV peers for precise testing.
❌ Cons of Massive
- Smaller advertised pool. ~1 M IPs versus NetNut’s 85 M, which may matter for massive, IP-intensive campaigns.
- Relatively new entrant. Launched in 2024 – shorter enterprise track record than some competitors.
What Are the Pros and Cons of NetNut?
✅ Pros of NetNut
- Extensive IP pool. Advertised 85 M+ residential IPs support extreme-scale campaigns.
- ISO 27001 certified. Meets enterprise-grade information security requirements.
- Diverse proxy types. Offers rotating residential, static residential, mobile, and datacenter proxies.
- Established provider. Operating since 2017 with thousands of customers.
- Built-in unblocker & data-scraper APIs. Website Unblocker and B2B Data Scraper endpoints simplify anti-bot bypass and structured-data retrieval.
❌ Cons of NetNut
- Rigid, high-cost pricing. Prepaid tiers only – no pay-as-you-go or bandwidth rollover, risking unused capacity.
- Opaque sourcing model. Proprietary infrastructure with no third-party audits may pose compliance concerns.
Best For Use Cases
Massive is Best For Ethical AI/LLM Data Sourcing & Performance-Critical Scraping
Massive is best for organizations requiring verifiable data provenance and cost-efficient, high-performance scraping. Its transparently sourced IPs work well for AI/LLM training datasets, while the reliable speeds support competitive web scraping for e-commerce monitoring, travel aggregation, and market research.
NetNut is Best For Maximum Coverage with Enterprise-Grade Security
NetNut is best when maximum IP breadth and formal InfoSec accreditation are essential, making it ideal for high-volume, compliance-driven global campaigns. However, this comes with prepaid requirements and potentially lower success rates.
Opiniones de clientes
Pregunta frecuente
Is a larger IP pool always better?
+
Not necessarily. Performance data shows that Massive's smaller, higher-quality pool of ~1 million IPs delivers better success rates and faster speeds than NetNut's 85 M+ IP pool. For most use cases, quality and reliability are more important than raw quantity.
Which service is more cost-effective?
+
Massive is more cost-effective and flexible. Its Pay-As-You-Go option and unique bandwidth rollover policy mean you never pay for data you don't use. NetNut's subscription-based bundles can lead to wasted spend if your usage fluctuates.
Why does transparent sourcing matter for AI training?
+
For AI and Large Language Models (LLMs), the quality and provenance of training data are critical. Using data from ambiguously sourced IPs can introduce legal risks, reputational damage, and poison the integrity of the model itself. A transparent, consent-based model like Massive's ensures a clean, auditable data supply chain.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Discover your ideal proxy
Loading...
