Massive vs. SOAX: Top Proxy Choice for Scraping 2025

TL;DR

Massive sets the benchmark for enterprise proxy performance — combining blazing-fast speed, transparent sourcing, and unbeatable value. With a 99.87% residential US success rate and 0.52s response time across the US & EU, it’s ideal for AI/ML data collection, web scraping, SEO monitoring, and other latency-sensitive use cases.

SOAX is a strong choice for enterprises that prioritize extensive IP diversity, versatile geographic targeting, and comprehensive feature sets. It offers 191+ million IPs spanning residential, mobile, and datacenter networks, with reliable connectivity across 195+ locations – perfect for SEO monitoring, social-media management, and general-purpose scraping.

‍

Massive vs. SOAX: Proxy Feature Comparison Table^*

<table class="GeneratedTable">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Attribute</th>
<th>Massive</th>
<th>SOAX</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Ethical sourcing & accreditation</td>
<td>AppEsteem-certified SDK, 100% opt-in</td>
<td>GDPR, CCPA (SOC2/ISO 27001 in progress)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Proxy acquisition model</td>
<td>In-app opt-in SDK</td>
<td>Claims ethical sourcing, limited transparency</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Residential IP pool size</td>
<td>1M advertised</td>
<td>155M+ advertised</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Residential success rate</td>
<td>99.87% (US) / 99.66% (Global)</td>
<td>98.25% (US) / 99.73% (Global)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Residential success rate on Amazon / Google / Instagram</td>
<td>93.85% / 88.29% / 96.29%</td>
<td>94.50% / 81.50% / 94.80%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Residential response time</td>
<td>0.52 s (US & EU) / 0.92 s (Global)</td>
<td>0.55 s (US) / 0.90 s (Global)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Residential response time on Amazon / Google / Instagram</td>
<td>3.68 s / 4.56 s / 3.97 s</td>
<td>4.55 s / 3.64 s / 8.35 s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ISP success rate</td>
<td>100%</td>
<td>98.78%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ISP success rate on Amazon / Google</td>
<td>98.03% / 100%</td>
<td>78.68% / 100%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ISP response time</td>
<td>0.09 s</td>
<td>0.23 s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ISP response time on Amazon / Google</td>
<td>2.85 s / 2.13 s</td>
<td>2.54 s / 2.56 s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sticky-IP window</td>
<td>1 – 60 min</td>
<td>10 sec – 60 min</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Device filters</td>
<td>Desktop / mobile / TV</td>
<td>—</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>PAYG price per GB</td>
<td>$3.99</td>
<td>$4.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Billing extras</td>
<td>Traffic rollover</td>
<td>Auto & manual top-up</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Bandwidth rollover</td>
<td>✅ Yes</td>
<td>❌ No</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>KYC requirements</td>
<td>✅ Optional (restricted targets)</td>
<td>✅ Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Usage restrictions</td>
<td>Blocks high-risk & adult content</td>
<td>Financial, gov domains, mailing. Unlockable with extra KYC</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mobile proxy pool</td>
<td>Coming soon</td>
<td>33M</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Other products</td>
<td>SERP API</td>
<td>Web Data API (beta)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

_{*Sources: Proxyway 2025 Market Research, company websites}

‍

What Are the Pros and Cons of Massive?

‍

✅ Pros of Massive

• Ethical & Compliance Certification. AppEsteem-certified network sourced via a proprietary SDK with explicit user consent, ensuring 100% opt-in, third-party-validated proxies.
• Low Latency. Average response times under 0.6 s, built for speed and high-throughput scraping.
• High Success Rates. 99.87% success on US targets and 100% ISP proxy performance on Google.
• Value for Money. Highly competitive pricing, flexible pay-as-you-go options, and substantial discounts for high-volume users.
• Bandwidth Rollover. Unused monthly data carries over to the next billing cycle, adding significant value to subscription plans.

❌ Cons of Massive

• Smaller IP Pool. Approximately 1 million IPs – smaller than Decodo’s network, which may limit extreme geographic scale.
• Narrow Proxy Offering. Focuses solely on residential and ISP proxies; lacks mobile and datacenter options available from competitors.

‍

What Are the Pros and Cons of SOAX?

‍

✅ Pros of SOAX

• Extensive Network Versatility: Offers a comprehensive suite of proxy types, including residential, mobile, ISP, and datacenter proxies, making it a flexible all-in-one solution.
• Massive Advertised IP Pool: Claims over 191 million IPs, providing extensive global coverage for tasks requiring a vast number of IP rotations.
• Lower Entry Price: With plans starting at $90/month, it is more accessible for smaller teams, solo operators, or those with limited budgets.
• Broad Protocol Support: Supports HTTP(S), SOCKS5, UDP, and QUIC, offering more technical flexibility for specialized use cases.
• Established Market Presence: Having been in the market since 2019 and recognized as a "Contender of the Year", SOAX has a long track record and a mature, user-friendly platform.

❌ Cons of SOAX

• Inconsistent Performance: While generally reliable, independent tests show its performance can be inconsistent across geographies, and it falls behind Massive in key benchmarks.
• Inefficient Pricing Model: Operates on a standard "use-it-or-lose-it" subscription model without rollover, which can lead to wasted spend for teams with fluctuating bandwidth needs.

‍

Best For Use Cases

‍

Massive is Best For Ethical Data Collection & Performance-Critical Web Scraping

Massive is built for performance at scale — delivering fast, reliable access to ethically sourced data. It’s the go-to solution for AI training, SEO monitoring, e-commerce tracking, travel aggregation, and market research where speed, accuracy, and volume matter most.

SOAX is Best For Diverse Requirements and Established Vendor Needs

SOAX is a mature, feature-rich platform ideal for teams that need a mix of residential, mobile, ISP, and datacenter proxies. With advanced targeting, flexible pricing, and broad protocol support, including UDP/QUIC, it suits organizations running diverse, large-scale data operations.