Massive vs. SOAX: Top Proxy Choice for Scraping 2025
TL;DR
Massive sets the benchmark for enterprise proxy performance — combining blazing-fast speed, transparent sourcing, and unbeatable value. With a 99.87% residential US success rate and 0.52s response time across the US & EU, it’s ideal for AI/ML data collection, web scraping, SEO monitoring, and other latency-sensitive use cases.
SOAX is a strong choice for enterprises that prioritize extensive IP diversity, versatile geographic targeting, and comprehensive feature sets. It offers 191+ million IPs spanning residential, mobile, and datacenter networks, with reliable connectivity across 195+ locations – perfect for SEO monitoring, social-media management, and general-purpose scraping.
Massive vs. SOAX: Proxy Feature Comparison Table*
| Attribute | Massive | SOAX |
|---|---|---|
| Ethical sourcing & accreditation | AppEsteem-certified SDK, 100% opt-in | GDPR, CCPA (SOC2/ISO 27001 in progress) |
| Proxy acquisition model | In-app opt-in SDK | Claims ethical sourcing, limited transparency |
| Residential IP pool size | 1M advertised | 155M+ advertised |
| Residential success rate | 99.87% (US) / 99.66% (Global) | 98.25% (US) / 99.73% (Global) |
| Residential success rate on Amazon / Google / Instagram | 93.85% / 88.29% / 96.29% | 94.50% / 81.50% / 94.80% |
| Residential response time | 0.52 s (US & EU) / 0.92 s (Global) | 0.55 s (US) / 0.90 s (Global) |
| Residential response time on Amazon / Google / Instagram | 3.68 s / 4.56 s / 3.97 s | 4.55 s / 3.64 s / 8.35 s |
| ISP success rate | 100% | 98.78% |
| ISP success rate on Amazon / Google | 98.03% / 100% | 78.68% / 100% |
| ISP response time | 0.09 s | 0.23 s |
| ISP response time on Amazon / Google | 2.85 s / 2.13 s | 2.54 s / 2.56 s |
| Sticky-IP window | 1 – 60 min | 10 sec – 60 min |
| Device filters | Desktop / mobile / TV | — |
| PAYG price per GB | $3.99 | $4.00 |
| Billing extras | Traffic rollover | Auto & manual top-up |
| Bandwidth rollover | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| KYC requirements | ✅ Optional (restricted targets) | ✅ Yes |
| Usage restrictions | Blocks high-risk & adult content | Financial, gov domains, mailing. Unlockable with extra KYC |
| Mobile proxy pool | Coming soon | 33M |
| Other products | SERP API | Web Data API (beta) |
*Sources: Proxyway 2025 Market Research, company websites
What Are the Pros and Cons of Massive?
✅ Pros of Massive
- Ethical & Compliance Certification. AppEsteem-certified network sourced via a proprietary SDK with explicit user consent, ensuring 100% opt-in, third-party-validated proxies.
- Low Latency. Average response times under 0.6 s, built for speed and high-throughput scraping.
- High Success Rates. 99.87% success on US targets and 100% ISP proxy performance on Google.
- Value for Money. Highly competitive pricing, flexible pay-as-you-go options, and substantial discounts for high-volume users.
- Bandwidth Rollover. Unused monthly data carries over to the next billing cycle, adding significant value to subscription plans.
❌ Cons of Massive
- Smaller IP Pool. Approximately 1 million IPs – smaller than SOAX’s network, which may limit extreme geographic scale.
- Narrow Proxy Offering. Focuses solely on residential and ISP proxies; lacks mobile and datacenter options available from competitors.
What Are the Pros and Cons of SOAX?
✅ Pros of SOAX
- Extensive Network Versatility: Offers a comprehensive suite of proxy types, including residential, mobile, ISP, and datacenter proxies, making it a flexible all-in-one solution.
- Massive Advertised IP Pool: Claims over 191 million IPs, providing extensive global coverage for tasks requiring a vast number of IP rotations.
- Lower Entry Price: With plans starting at $90/month, it is more accessible for smaller teams, solo operators, or those with limited budgets.
- Broad Protocol Support: Supports HTTP(S), SOCKS5, UDP, and QUIC, offering more technical flexibility for specialized use cases.
- Established Market Presence: Having been in the market since 2019 and recognized as a "Contender of the Year", SOAX has a long track record and a mature, user-friendly platform.
❌ Cons of SOAX
- Inconsistent Performance: While generally reliable, independent tests show its performance can be inconsistent across geographies, and it falls behind Massive in key benchmarks.
- Inefficient Pricing Model: Operates on a standard "use-it-or-lose-it" subscription model without rollover, which can lead to wasted spend for teams with fluctuating bandwidth needs.
Best For Use Cases
Massive is Best For Ethical Data Collection & Performance-Critical Web Scraping
Massive is built for performance at scale — delivering fast, reliable access to ethically sourced data. It’s the go-to solution for AI training, SEO monitoring, e-commerce tracking, travel aggregation, and market research where speed, accuracy, and volume matter most.
SOAX is Best For Diverse Requirements and Established Vendor Needs
SOAX is a mature, feature-rich platform ideal for teams that need a mix of residential, mobile, ISP, and datacenter proxies. With advanced targeting, flexible pricing, and broad protocol support, including UDP/QUIC, it suits organizations running diverse, large-scale data operations.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which provider has better performance and reliability?
Massive has demonstrably better performance. It is top-ranked in independent 2025 benchmarks for US success rates (99.87%) and ISP proxy performance (100% success), metrics where SOAX ranks lower. This directly translates to more reliable data collection.
Which provider is more ethical and transparent?
Massive is more transparent. It uses a 100% SDK-based sourcing model with a clear, auditable consent chain and holds an AppEsteem certification to prove it. SOAX's sourcing model is opaque and lacks current third-party validation.
Who has the bigger IP pool?
SOAX advertises a much larger IP pool (191M+). However, Massive argues that its focus on a smaller pool of high-quality, daily active IPs is a more meaningful metric for technical performance and reliability.
Can I migrate from my current proxy provider to Massive?
Yes, Massive offers migration support and Pay-As-You-Go options to test before committing to larger plans. The straightforward setup process makes transitions smooth.