Massive vs. Decodo: Best Proxy Provider in 2025
TL;DR
Massive is a strong choice for enterprises that prioritize premium performance, verifiable ethical sourcing, and flexible, value-oriented pricing. With a 99.87% residential US success rate and 0.52s average response time across the US & EU, it’s ideal for AI/ML data collection and other latency-sensitive use cases.
Decodo (formerly Smartproxy) offers a large, diverse IP pool and a robust suite of data collection tools. Its 99.82% residential US success rate and 0.60s US response time make it a solid choice for teams needing global reach and scalable infrastructure.
Massive vs. Decodo: Proxy Feature Comparison Table*
| Attribute | Massive | Decodo |
|---|---|---|
| Ethical sourcing & accreditation | AppEsteem-certified SDK, 100% opt-in | EWDCI-certified, founding member |
| Proxy acquisition model | In-app opt-in SDK | Reputable providers & P2P network |
| Residential IP pool size | 1M advertised | 115M advertised |
| Residential success rate | 99.87% (US) / 99.66% (Global) | 99.82% (US) / 99.86% (Global) |
| Residential success rate on Amazon / Google / Instagram | 93.85% / 88.29% / 96.29% | 95.65% / 87.33% / 93.02% |
| Residential response time | 0.52 s (US & EU) / 0.92 s (Global) | 0.60 s (US) / 0.63 s (Global) |
| Residential response time on Amazon / Google / Instagram | 3.68 s / 4.56 s / 3.97 s | 3.59 s / 4.34 s / 4.21 s |
| ISP success rate | 100% | 100% |
| ISP success rate on Amazon / Google | 98.03% / 100% | 100% / 93.12% |
| ISP response time | 0.09 s | 0.22 s |
| ISP response time on Amazon / Google | 2.85 s / 2.13 s | 3.00 s / 2.19 s |
| Sticky-IP window | 1 – 60 min | 1 min – 24 h |
| Device filters | Desktop / mobile / TV | — |
| PAYG price per GB | $3.99 | $3.50 |
| Billing extras | Traffic rollover | Auto & manual top-up |
| Bandwidth rollover | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| KYC requirements | Optional (restricted targets) | Required (higher-risk use) |
| Usage restrictions | Blocks high-risk & adult content | Undisclosed blacklist, “family-friendly” policy |
| Mobile proxy pool | Coming soon | 10 M |
| Other products | SERP API | Web Scraping API, SERP API, Site Unblocker, X-Browser |
*Sources: Proxyway 2025 Market Research, company websites
What Are the Pros and Cons of Massive?
✅ Pros of Massive
- Ethical & Compliance Certification. AppEsteem-certified network sourced via a proprietary SDK with explicit user consent, ensuring 100% opt-in, third-party-validated proxies.
- Low Latency. Average response times under 0.6 s, built for speed and high-throughput scraping.
- High Success Rates. 99.87% success on US targets and 100% ISP proxy performance on Google.
- Value for Money. Highly competitive pricing, flexible pay-as-you-go options, and substantial discounts for high-volume users.
- Bandwidth Rollover. Unused monthly data carries over to the next billing cycle, adding significant value to subscription plans.
❌ Cons of Massive
- Smaller IP Pool. Approximately 1 million IPs – smaller than Decodo’s network, which may limit extreme geographic scale.
- Narrow Proxy Offering. Focuses solely on residential and ISP proxies; lacks mobile and datacenter options available from competitors.
What Are the Pros and Cons of Decodo?
✅ Pros of Decodo
- Network Scale & Diversity. Access to over 125 million IPs across residential, ISP, mobile, and datacenter proxies.
- Value for Money. Competitive pricing, flexible pay-as-you-go plans, and volume discounts for high-usage customers.
- Comprehensive Tool Suite. Integrated ecosystem including a site unblocker, scraping APIs, and an anti-detect browser.
- Low Latency. Average response times of 0.63 s in global tests, delivering fast performance worldwide.
- User-Friendly Platform. Clean dashboard, straightforward API setup, and 24/7 live-chat support.
❌ Cons of Decodo
- Indirect Proxy Sourcing. Relies on third-party providers and a P2P network, resulting in less transparent lineage than in-app SDK models.
- No Third-Party Certification: Lacks certifications such as AppEsteem for ethical sourcing validation.
Best For Use Cases
Massive is Best For Ethical AI/LLM Data Sourcing & Performance-Critical Scraping
Massive is best for organizations that need verifiable data provenance for AI/LLM training datasets and cost-efficient, high-throughput scraping for e-commerce monitoring, travel aggregation, and market research.
Decodo is Best For Broad Coverage & Full-Stack Data Collection
Decodo is best for companies requiring massive, diverse IP coverage and a full-stack suite of data-collection tools (scraping APIs, site unblocker, anti-detect browser, etc.).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which provider is better for ethical sourcing?
Massive holds the edge with AppEsteem certification and a fully opt-in SDK that guarantees 100 % ethically sourced IPs via third-party validation. Decodo co-founded the EWDCI but doesn’t offer an equivalent certification.
Can I target specific cities or device types?
Both support geo-targeting down to city and ZIP. Massive adds device-type targeting (desktop, mobile, smart TV), while Decodo focuses on geographic precision alone.
Which has the larger IP pool?
Decodo offers 125 M+ IPs across residential, mobile, ISP, and datacenter. Massive maintains a more curated ~1 M residential + ISP pool focused on quality and compliance.
How do they compare on tough-to-scrape sites like Amazon or Google?
Independent tests show Massive’s ISP proxies hitting 100 % success on Google and slightly outperforming on Amazon. Decodo performs very well too, but Massive holds a small edge on high-block targets.